All Discussions Tagged 'Civil' - CSRNation2024-03-28T20:10:58Zhttp://csrnation.ning.com/forum/topic/listForTag?tag=Civil&feed=yes&xn_auth=noLaws concerning the copy side ordering what was originally a hold...tag:csrnation.ning.com,2012-08-24:1736041:Topic:12411352012-08-24T21:54:38.628ZJoshuahttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/JoshuaColburn
<p>Hello all--</p>
<p></p>
<p>I've never made a post on here yet, mostly just lurked, but today I have a bit of a conundrum and can't find the section of the law I'm looking for. A job that my firm covered on 8/15 was originally a hold by the taking/noticing attorney. On 8/18, the opposing counsel ordered a copy of the transcript. I know there's a section in the regulations where that makes the original noticing attorney now responsible for the O+1, but I can't seem to find the part I'm…</p>
<p>Hello all--</p>
<p></p>
<p>I've never made a post on here yet, mostly just lurked, but today I have a bit of a conundrum and can't find the section of the law I'm looking for. A job that my firm covered on 8/15 was originally a hold by the taking/noticing attorney. On 8/18, the opposing counsel ordered a copy of the transcript. I know there's a section in the regulations where that makes the original noticing attorney now responsible for the O+1, but I can't seem to find the part I'm looking for. If anyone can help point me in the right direction, I would be forever grateful. Thanks!</p>