In the hearing I just concluded, the judge never marks exhibits for identification. The attorney will reference an exhibit, "Please turn to Exhibit A in the binder," and they'll talk about that exhibit, but he never enters it for identification. Then he only admits certain exhibits that pertain to that witness, and not others that they've also talked about.
So my question is, when they simply reference an exhibit is do I put it in my index as being marked for identification?
In this hearing there are exhibits A-BB. But only J, K, L, M, N and U were actually admitted into evidence on the day of my hearing. Do I list all the exhibits that were referenced to in my index or only the ones that are marked and admitted into evidence?
Wow, I made this confusing. Any help would be greatly appreciated!!