No copy order - Be aware!! - CSRNation2024-03-28T19:56:31Zhttp://csrnation.ning.com/forum/topics/no-copy-order-be-aware?commentId=1736041%3AComment%3A1213403&feed=yes&xn_auth=noYeah, I'm familiar with the "…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-12-20:1736041:Comment:12137032011-12-20T19:41:44.557ZQuyenhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/QuyenNDo
<p>Yeah, I'm familiar with the "if we don't do it, someone else will" mentality as it pertains to clients. So doing away with the stip will never happen anytime soon.</p>
<p>Yeah, I'm familiar with the "if we don't do it, someone else will" mentality as it pertains to clients. So doing away with the stip will never happen anytime soon.</p> I'm from So Cal.
You'll never…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-12-20:1736041:Comment:12136992011-12-20T11:32:59.672ZJudyhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/JudyRunes
<p>I'm from So Cal.</p>
<p>You'll never get the firms' support. Seriously, if reporters in So Cal start outwardly messing with the way attorneys conduct (what they believe to be) their stips, they'll just move on to another CR firm. If your clients start losing their clients, I'm sure I don't have to tell you what happens to you. In this economy, everybody is struggling to retain their client base. And since a lot of court reporters are struggling to fill up their weeks nowadays, it's just…</p>
<p>I'm from So Cal.</p>
<p>You'll never get the firms' support. Seriously, if reporters in So Cal start outwardly messing with the way attorneys conduct (what they believe to be) their stips, they'll just move on to another CR firm. If your clients start losing their clients, I'm sure I don't have to tell you what happens to you. In this economy, everybody is struggling to retain their client base. And since a lot of court reporters are struggling to fill up their weeks nowadays, it's just a line through a name on an overflow list and moving down to the next available reporter, and the agency's problem is solved.</p> Gwen, you make an excellent p…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-12-19:1736041:Comment:12135372011-12-19T19:02:51.393ZQuyenhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/QuyenNDo
<p>Gwen, you make an excellent point. That is how I've always viewed the stip, that it's our duty that cannot be stipulated away for us without our consent. If ALL reporters would take this position and stand firm on it TOGETHER, I believe we could do away with the stip altogether. We would also need the CR firms' full support in this.</p>
<p>Gwen, you make an excellent point. That is how I've always viewed the stip, that it's our duty that cannot be stipulated away for us without our consent. If ALL reporters would take this position and stand firm on it TOGETHER, I believe we could do away with the stip altogether. We would also need the CR firms' full support in this.</p> I'm coming into this discussi…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-12-18:1736041:Comment:12134032011-12-18T04:14:48.984ZGwen Brasshttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/GwenBrass
<p>I'm coming into this discussion late but when I worked in northern Calif and southern Calif attorneys would come up and try this, I always said, I'm sorry, but I do not agree to you stipulating away my responsibilities under the code. And I refused to send the original to the attorney. I had a couple argue with me, but never once in 18 years did I come across an attorney who did not back down quickly when I held my ground. </p>
<p>Maybe the code has changed. But it used to be that it was…</p>
<p>I'm coming into this discussion late but when I worked in northern Calif and southern Calif attorneys would come up and try this, I always said, I'm sorry, but I do not agree to you stipulating away my responsibilities under the code. And I refused to send the original to the attorney. I had a couple argue with me, but never once in 18 years did I come across an attorney who did not back down quickly when I held my ground. </p>
<p>Maybe the code has changed. But it used to be that it was the COURT REPORTER'S duty and responsibility, not the attorney's. Therefore, the reporter is the only one who can stipulate something different. If there was any argument, which was always that the reporters in So Cal did it, I enlightened them that those reporters charged more because of it and while they may be willing to make that stipulation, I was not.</p> Maybe this will work:
You h…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-27:1736041:Comment:12066992011-11-27T13:01:54.570ZMary Jo Cochranhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/MaryJoCochran
<p>Maybe this will work:</p>
<p> </p>
<div>You have reached the cached page for <strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ncraonline.org/NR/rdonlyres/9B4A4D87-9586-4E6C-9C61-BFDF53DB6C5D/0/0303_02_transcript.pdf">http://www.ncraonline.org/NR/rdonlyres/9B4A4D87-9586-4E6C-9C61-BFDF...</a></strong></div>
<p> </p>
<p>OR---- type in this phrase in yahoo or google</p>
<p> </p>
<p>WHO OWNS THE TRANSCRIPT - MONA SAVINO</p>
<p>Maybe this will work:</p>
<p> </p>
<div>You have reached the cached page for <strong><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.ncraonline.org/NR/rdonlyres/9B4A4D87-9586-4E6C-9C61-BFDF53DB6C5D/0/0303_02_transcript.pdf">http://www.ncraonline.org/NR/rdonlyres/9B4A4D87-9586-4E6C-9C61-BFDF...</a></strong></div>
<p> </p>
<p>OR---- type in this phrase in yahoo or google</p>
<p> </p>
<p>WHO OWNS THE TRANSCRIPT - MONA SAVINO</p> Mona Savino wrote an article…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-27:1736041:Comment:12070662011-11-27T12:44:15.278ZMary Jo Cochranhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/MaryJoCochran
<p>Mona Savino wrote an article for NCRA:…</p>
<p></p>
<p>Mona Savino wrote an article for NCRA:</p>
<p><a href="http://74.6.117.48/search/srpcache?ei=UTF-8&p=court+reporter%27s+seal+of+official+transcript+to+prohibit+unauthorized+copying&fr=yfp-t-701&u=http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=court+reporter%27s+seal+of+official+transcript+to+prohibit+unauthorized+copying&d=4756032391023113&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=ff4fd18,f77b1dd4&icp=1&.intl=us&sig=7PQnqGhunyzUgvzeOOQ4aw">http://74.6.117.48/search/srpcache?ei=UTF-8&p=court+reporter%27s+seal+of+official+transcript+to+prohibit+unauthorized+copying&fr=yfp-t-701&u=http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=court+reporter%27s+seal+of+official+transcript+to+prohibit+unauthorized+copying&d=4756032391023113&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=ff4fd18,f77b1dd4&icp=1&.intl=us&sig=7PQnqGhunyzUgvzeOOQ4aw</a>--</p> There's a court reporter on t…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-27:1736041:Comment:12066972011-11-27T07:18:42.112ZGrace M. Thompsonhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/GraceMThompson
<p>There's a court reporter on this site, Kelli, who I've worked for in the past who has a FANTASTIC 'addition' to her Cert page. It reads something like this: "That dismantling this transcript will void the court reporter's official certification of this transcript." Can't hurt, might help??</p>
<p>There's a court reporter on this site, Kelli, who I've worked for in the past who has a FANTASTIC 'addition' to her Cert page. It reads something like this: "That dismantling this transcript will void the court reporter's official certification of this transcript." Can't hurt, might help??</p> pdf-it has a feature where yo…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-21:1736041:Comment:12067502011-11-21T15:37:18.690ZJudyhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/JudyRunes
<p>pdf-it has a feature where you can e-mail a Read & Sign file to the deponent or their counsel. It allows the recipient to print only the pages I allow it print (the sig page and errata sheet). They're instructed to read the transcript, print and fill out the errata and sig page, then mail those pages to me so I can complete my task. I just recently sent one out for the first time -- I'm in SoCal and constantly have my original stipped to opposing counsel. I got to do this one b/c…</p>
<p>pdf-it has a feature where you can e-mail a Read & Sign file to the deponent or their counsel. It allows the recipient to print only the pages I allow it print (the sig page and errata sheet). They're instructed to read the transcript, print and fill out the errata and sig page, then mail those pages to me so I can complete my task. I just recently sent one out for the first time -- I'm in SoCal and constantly have my original stipped to opposing counsel. I got to do this one b/c they're out-of-state counsel -- so hopefully it works as planned.</p>
<p>But I will say this about the "SoCal Stip." It does make my job easier, not having to comply with getting sigs and keeping everybody informed. I'm certainly not condoning it, just saying.</p> Yes, that's a good idea, Ann.…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-21:1736041:Comment:12069412011-11-21T01:39:24.716ZQuyenhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/QuyenNDo
<p>Yes, that's a good idea, Ann. But there is nowhere in the code that says the witness must be provided a copy to read and sign. All it says is that it must be made AVAILABLE. It's available -- <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>IN THE CR OFFICE</strong></span>, if the witness's attorney doesn't order a copy. It's not our problem if it's "too far" or too inconvenient for the witness to travel to the office. If it were a short depo, I'm not sure I'd really care all that…</p>
<p>Yes, that's a good idea, Ann. But there is nowhere in the code that says the witness must be provided a copy to read and sign. All it says is that it must be made AVAILABLE. It's available -- <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>IN THE CR OFFICE</strong></span>, if the witness's attorney doesn't order a copy. It's not our problem if it's "too far" or too inconvenient for the witness to travel to the office. If it were a short depo, I'm not sure I'd really care all that much. The E-Trans has a print lockout feature. Do they want to do a screen print of 100+ pages, if they're too cheap to pay for a copy? If they're that desperate, I say, knock yourself out.</p> What about the possibility of…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-21:1736041:Comment:12068422011-11-21T01:29:59.223ZAnn Medishttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/AnnMedis
<p>What about the possibility of uploading the "Original" onto a repository for the witness to read at their convenience and having restrictions set so that it could not be printed, saved, a screen shot made, etc.? Would the rules allow that? </p>
<p>What about the possibility of uploading the "Original" onto a repository for the witness to read at their convenience and having restrictions set so that it could not be printed, saved, a screen shot made, etc.? Would the rules allow that? </p>