patent infringement terms - CSRNation2024-03-29T09:33:40Zhttp://csrnation.ning.com/forum/topics/patent-infringement-terms?groupUrl=briefgroup&commentId=1736041%3AComment%3A1240153&groupId=1736041%3AGroup%3A1113748&feed=yes&xn_auth=noTOEUP = attorney/client privi…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2012-08-13:1736041:Comment:12401532012-08-13T21:05:37.285ZJennifer L. Terrerihttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/JenniferLFuria
<p>TOEUP = attorney/client privilege</p>
<p>TOEUBG = attorney/client (since they say that sometimes)</p>
<p>TPRAOUP = Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</p>
<p>THROERPBG = theory of infringement (can we even do this? I have to look at my keys. This one is difficult)</p>
<p></p>
<p>TOEUP = attorney/client privilege</p>
<p>TOEUBG = attorney/client (since they say that sometimes)</p>
<p>TPRAOUP = Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</p>
<p>THROERPBG = theory of infringement (can we even do this? I have to look at my keys. This one is difficult)</p>
<p></p> I learned TRIFL for attorney-…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2012-07-24:1736041:Comment:12373832012-07-24T00:35:34.499ZLeAnne Lawhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/LeAnneLaw
<p>I learned TRIFL for attorney-client privilege. Maybe that will work for you.</p>
<p>I learned TRIFL for attorney-client privilege. Maybe that will work for you.</p> Thanks, guys, there are some…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2012-07-23:1736041:Comment:12373212012-07-23T19:36:31.163ZGwen Brasshttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/GwenBrass
<p>Thanks, guys, there are some good ones there. WAL is my misstroke for balance. <g> I like it for intellectual!</p>
<p></p>
<p>I used to have a brief for attorney/client privilege, but I can't remember it. I think it was similar to TOERP but when I just tried it out, it came out as my misstroke for attorney. (Are you seeing a pattern here?) I bet I did used to use it for attorney/client privilege and lost that when I switched over dictionaries recently (and lost a ton of stuff due…</p>
<p>Thanks, guys, there are some good ones there. WAL is my misstroke for balance. <g> I like it for intellectual!</p>
<p></p>
<p>I used to have a brief for attorney/client privilege, but I can't remember it. I think it was similar to TOERP but when I just tried it out, it came out as my misstroke for attorney. (Are you seeing a pattern here?) I bet I did used to use it for attorney/client privilege and lost that when I switched over dictionaries recently (and lost a ton of stuff due to not having backed up in a long long time).</p>
<p></p>
<p>LOVE the don't answer one. The not to answer tranned out as noons, but I doubt I've ever had that word come up so I think I'll change it.</p> KLAOIP - attorney/client priv…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2012-07-23:1736041:Comment:12371232012-07-23T19:15:21.516ZCindy Boedyhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/CindyBoedy
<p>KLAOIP - attorney/client privilege.</p>
<p>I use IP for implant but for your job dictionary it's a good idea. But as you questioned, I don't remember it being a common phrase in the dep. A great brief I acquired for intellectual is WAL - loved it since I learned it!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>KLAOIP - attorney/client privilege.</p>
<p>I use IP for implant but for your job dictionary it's a good idea. But as you questioned, I don't remember it being a common phrase in the dep. A great brief I acquired for intellectual is WAL - loved it since I learned it!</p>
<p> </p> IP EUP
intell…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2012-07-23:1736041:Comment:12373152012-07-23T19:08:51.285ZAnn Medishttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/AnnMedis
<p>IP EUP</p>
<p>intellectual property EUP EUP </p>
<p>Fre Rul Civ Pro FROULZ SEUP (in current NCRA magazine)</p>
<p>attorney/client privilege TOERP</p>
<p>don't answer DAONS</p>
<p>not to answer NAONS</p>
<p>patent PAENT</p>
<p>infringement STPREUPLT (not a brief but a one stroker)</p>
<p>patent office POFS</p>
<p>theory of infringement I don't…</p>
<p>IP EUP</p>
<p>intellectual property EUP EUP </p>
<p>Fre Rul Civ Pro FROULZ SEUP (in current NCRA magazine)</p>
<p>attorney/client privilege TOERP</p>
<p>don't answer DAONS</p>
<p>not to answer NAONS</p>
<p>patent PAENT</p>
<p>infringement STPREUPLT (not a brief but a one stroker)</p>
<p>patent office POFS</p>
<p>theory of infringement I don't have one, but THEUFRPBLG probably won't conflict with too many words.</p>
<p>Gwen, there is a thread on this site listing some great common patent briefs. Have a bunch of job briefs for the subject matter of your patent case. Good luck to you.</p>
<p></p>