What does Mark recommend on conflicts??? - CSRNation2024-03-28T18:45:25Zhttp://csrnation.ning.com/forum/topics/what-does-mark-recommend-on-conflicts?groupUrl=magnumstenofanclub&commentId=1736041%3AComment%3A1205605&groupId=1736041%3AGroup%3A1003772&feed=yes&xn_auth=nothanks, LeAnne.....you were r…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-18:1736041:Comment:12055232011-11-18T16:32:40.065ZWynne A. Paulyhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/WynneAPauly
<p>thanks, LeAnne.....you were right....I wof preferred something different....oh, dear me.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have my OR stroke defined with three possibilities....and one possibility is that prefix....now why I have that I can't rer....and with Version 5 not choosing the conflicts I'm starting to see what conflicts I have that I need to just get a different stroke for it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>thanks, LeAnne.....you were right....I wof preferred something different....oh, dear me.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have my OR stroke defined with three possibilities....and one possibility is that prefix....now why I have that I can't rer....and with Version 5 not choosing the conflicts I'm starting to see what conflicts I have that I need to just get a different stroke for it.</p>
<p> </p> You're not going to like it -…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-18:1736041:Comment:12056052011-11-18T16:30:52.645ZLeAnne Lawhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/LeAnneLaw
<p>You're not going to like it -- FO*ER. </p>
<p>I don't have one for or^. The words get their own definition. </p>
<p>You're not going to like it -- FO*ER. </p>
<p>I don't have one for or^. The words get their own definition. </p> does anyone have a stroke for…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-18:1736041:Comment:12054322011-11-18T16:28:24.200ZWynne A. Paulyhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/WynneAPauly
<p>does anyone have a stroke for {fore^}....like a prefix</p>
<p>what about {or^}....like the first syllable of a word?</p>
<p>does anyone have a stroke for {fore^}....like a prefix</p>
<p>what about {or^}....like the first syllable of a word?</p> thanks, Marge, super kewl.tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-18:1736041:Comment:12055032011-11-18T01:27:14.515ZWynne A. Paulyhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/WynneAPauly
<p>thanks, Marge, super kewl.</p>
<p>thanks, Marge, super kewl.</p> for the = FOT
for it = FO*T
f…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-18:1736041:Comment:12052982011-11-18T00:51:20.663ZMarge Teilhaber (TILE hobber)http://csrnation.ning.com/profile/MargeTeilhaber
<p>for the = FOT</p>
<p>for it = FO*T</p>
<p>for that = FOP</p>
<p>for many = FOM (I use FO*M because I always hit FOM when I want FOP)</p>
<p>for this = FOJ</p>
<p>for these = FOJS</p>
<p>for those = FOJZ</p>
<p>for his = FOS</p>
<p>for how long = FOUG</p>
<p> </p>
<p>for the = FOT</p>
<p>for it = FO*T</p>
<p>for that = FOP</p>
<p>for many = FOM (I use FO*M because I always hit FOM when I want FOP)</p>
<p>for this = FOJ</p>
<p>for these = FOJS</p>
<p>for those = FOJZ</p>
<p>for his = FOS</p>
<p>for how long = FOUG</p>
<p> </p> thank you, LeAnne!
what are s…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-18:1736041:Comment:12054982011-11-18T00:35:07.227ZWynne A. Paulyhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/WynneAPauly
<p>thank you, LeAnne!</p>
<p>what are some "for" phrases?</p>
<p>thank you, LeAnne!</p>
<p>what are some "for" phrases?</p> HAOER - here
HAER - hear
FOR…tag:csrnation.ning.com,2011-11-17:1736041:Comment:12052922011-11-17T21:03:47.119ZLeAnne Lawhttp://csrnation.ning.com/profile/LeAnneLaw
<p>HAOER - here</p>
<p>HAER - hear</p>
<p>FOR - for</p>
<p>FO - in phrases</p>
<p>FOUR - four</p>
<p>Number bar for 4. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>HAOER - here</p>
<p>HAER - hear</p>
<p>FOR - for</p>
<p>FO - in phrases</p>
<p>FOUR - four</p>
<p>Number bar for 4. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>