A court reporter did not show up for a video deposition, and the lawyers agreed to go forward with the de bene esse deposition anyway. The videographer was a notary and gave the oath to the witness.

Now they want a transcript. After a few phone calls between the videographer and a few court reporting companies in my area, it was referred to me. I was given the DVD and no notes.

After the first counsel examines the witness, asking him his credentials as a doctor, he states in colloquy that he wants to submit this witness as an expert. Opposing counsel wants to then ask a few questions, what I'm thinking is voir dire.

My confusion is this. If this was in court, the opposing counsel's questions would be considered "voir dire examination." A de bene esse deposition is supposed to be the expert's testimony outside of court but for court use later on, I think.

Do I just carry it as examination by counsel for the plaintiff and/or examination by counsel for the defendant? Am I supposed to insert "voir dire examination" when opposing counsel wants to see if this witness is truly qualified to be an expert?

What I am asking for is how to label the EXAMINATION BY lines. Should I use standard deposition format? Do I not use the term "VOIR DIRE" in the EXAMINATION BY lines?

Views: 208

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"The court reporter didn't show up," my ass. How many times has a reporter just NOT shown up? I had a reporter get a flat on the freeway once and couldn't show up. I had a reporter forget that her machine was in her car that her sister borrowed and it started late. I've had ~somebody~ write down that the depo was supposed to start at 1:00 and it really started at 10:00 (that was either the atty's sec or the CR's scheduler's fault). I've had secretaries say, Oops, I forgot to schedule this, how soon can somebody be here? But the CR didn't show up? Bah, humbug.

But that wasn't your question, Jennie. And, sorry, I don't have an answer for you. I do everything under
-EXAMINATION- (centered, of course) with my everyday BY lines and Q&A and make life easy on myself.
LOL @ Judy. I was thinking the same thing, Judy, about the lack of a court reporter.

I haven't done legal stuff in YEARS. I am familiar with traditional deposition format, but I was not sure about this one because it sure does sound like voir dire examination to me.

I have never seen VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION in a deposition, though. However, it's been a long time since I've done anything like this. Thanks for the reply, Judy! :-)
I think they're lucky that you're helping them at all (considering one of the options that I didn't mention was they were just being CHEAP) and I wouldn't worry too much about the headings and just get the puppy out the door.
Treat it like a deposition.
Out of sight and out of mind. Gone, gone, gone. The puppy is out the door. LOL

I was uncomfortable doing this job, as I don't do legal anymore. I must say, though, that the audio quality was excellent, and that was a plus. However, I did have one a phonetic parenthetical by a person's name that I could not find. Of course, the videographer didn't have a court reporting ear and ask for the spellings at the conclusion.

Also, there was simultaneous speaking several times. A competent court reporter would have told them to speak one at a time.

What took the longest amount of time for me was setting up the title page, appearances, and content page. I kept going back and forth on that contents page, trying to decide which style I like best. That's where having one format, like Califronia, works best, I think, eliminating questions on style and format.

I had never worked for this entity before, as they were a referral. I requested a credit card to guarantee payment, and they asked if they could give me a check. So, instead of charging a page rate, I charged a per-minute rate. This is where charging a per-minute rate can be a good thing, knowing how much the job is before you start.

I had forgotten how many pages Q and A can generate, and I think I didn't charge enough. In my area, most transcripts are 22 lines per page, unlike the California standard format. Usually, I get 50 pages per audio hour. This deposition was 55 minutes long, and I got 59 pages.

All in all, it was fun, but I think I kind of like my general transcription world better, though I was wondering the entire time I was typing if I could make more money scoping. ;-)
With the quality of your work and know-how, I bet you could make a killing scoping.

RSS

Latest Activity

Erica Field joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
20 hours ago
Kim Kyle commented on Janet's page Scopists
yesterday
Carol Lancaster is now a member of CSRNation
yesterday
GregoryEdwards LLC joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
yesterday
Newman Proofreading shared Janet's page on Facebook
Tuesday
Erica Field joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
Monday
Erica Field joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
Monday
Newman Proofreading commented on Janet's page Proofreaders
Monday
Newman Proofreading updated their profile
Monday
Newman Proofreading posted a status
"Hi! We are looking for new proofreaders to join our team!! Please email us with any questions jayproof.reader@gmail.com"
Monday
Kelli Combs (admin) left a comment for Chloe Meghan
Monday
Continental Court Reporters, Inc joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
Monday

© 2025   Created by Kelli Combs (admin).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service