A court reporter did not show up for a video deposition, and the lawyers agreed to go forward with the de bene esse deposition anyway. The videographer was a notary and gave the oath to the witness.
Now they want a transcript. After a few phone calls between the videographer and a few court reporting companies in my area, it was referred to me. I was given the DVD and no notes.
After the first counsel examines the witness, asking him his credentials as a doctor, he states in colloquy that he wants to submit this witness as an expert. Opposing counsel wants to then ask a few questions, what I'm thinking is voir dire.
My confusion is this. If this was in court, the opposing counsel's questions would be considered "voir dire examination." A de bene esse deposition is supposed to be the expert's testimony outside of court but for court use later on, I think.
Do I just carry it as examination by counsel for the plaintiff and/or examination by counsel for the defendant? Am I supposed to insert "voir dire examination" when opposing counsel wants to see if this witness is truly qualified to be an expert?
What I am asking for is how to label the EXAMINATION BY lines. Should I use standard deposition format? Do I not use the term "VOIR DIRE" in the EXAMINATION BY lines?