Did anyone see this article? It was in the NCRA Tech Tracker e-mail.
http://www.odt.co.nz/your-town/dunedin/60346/dunedin-court-reportin...
How do you feel about this quote?
"It allows jury trials to be transcribed without stopping. It is expected to cut the time jury trials take by about a third by allowing evidence to be heard at normal speaking speed. "
I worked as an official in federal court, and I can tell you I did nothing to impede the speed of the trials. On the rare occasion I'd ask for a clarification, it was to ensure that the record is 100 percent accurate.
They are dreaming if they think this is a better system. Can you imagine how many "inaudible" notations are going to result?
Here's another quote:
"Ms Beech said it meant the scheduling of hearings was not limited by the availability of local transcription staff, and the quality of court transcribing would be consistent."
I'm sure the quality will be consistent -- substandard.
Take a look at the article. My blood was boiling.
Janet