When you read back a question, do you clean it up, or do you read it with all the false starts and randomness?

Views: 40

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion


I read back exactly what was said. Sometimes it is very difficult to do especially with false starts. But I'm not an editor when I write, so I'll read back exactly what my notes say -- for better or worse.

Good luck.

Bubbie Karen
Verbatim, including false starts and randomness. Apart from my own policy of not cleaning up attorneys or witnesses, someone in that room is bound to remember at least some of those false starts and randomness, and they're likely to wonder what else I'm doing to make that transcript sound better.
It all depends. Just recently I had a client who got confused my his own question (go figure.) He asked me to read back his question to him. Knowing how jumbled his question was, I just asked him if he wanted to read it instead. I knew he might be a bit embarassed if I actually read his question out loud. He leaned over and read his question and then looked at me and thanked me then continued on to ask a cleaner Q than before.

Generally if there is a false start or as you say randomness, only if what follows that is the actual question will I only read back the meat of it, the actual question. Everyone in the room knows there was a false start and the mumbo jumbo, if they want that read back then I read that. I follow the directive to me which is "read me back the question."

of course if the question contains the randomness then they get read back the whole thing.

Sort of along the same lines of this question, when you have a partial question, an objection, and then the end of the question, then asked for a readback of the "question," then I read back just the question.
I read exactly what was said.
Ah the readback. Also known as the attorney gobbledeygook stimulus package. Unfortunately, you have to read it back word for word because you're probably in 90 percent of the cases, reading back something that is poorly phrased, which resulted in the witnesses saying, can you run that by me again, or it drew an objection with that unuttered parenthetical (dumbassed question) also known as "Objection. Form." There is that gem of the 10 percent which are really crackingly good questions which are a pleasure to read back. But when it's a poorly phrased question, you get some of them who look at you as if it were your fault it fell out of their mouths. Such is the life of the court reporter. Im with Bubbie. For good or ill, read it back verbatim.


Latest Activity

Harman Singh commented on Kelli Combs (admin)'s group Proofreaders
10 hours ago
Harman Singh joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
10 hours ago
Kelli Combs (admin) left a comment for APEX COURT REPORTING
11 hours ago
APEX COURT REPORTING joined Cassandra's group
12 hours ago
APEX COURT REPORTING joined April Floyd's group
12 hours ago
Sheri Abraham posted a status
"Can somebody give me guidance on how to prepare an ATF Admin hearing transcript? I have no idea what the title page would look like. TIA!"
16 hours ago
Kelli Combs (admin) left a comment for Linda Troxel
18 hours ago
Kelli Combs (admin) left a comment for Harman Singh
18 hours ago
Kelli Combs (admin) commented on Kelli Combs (admin)'s group Eclipse Scopist (Send work request)
18 hours ago
Harman Singh commented on Janet's page Proofreaders
Harman Singh updated their profile
Angie Ploch posted a blog post

© 2022   Created by Kelli Combs (admin).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service