Is there a certain parenthetical that reporters use when an attorney asks for a question to be read back and then the reporter ends up NOT reading it back??

Views: 90

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Not that I know of -- usually what happens is opposing counsel, or the witness, say something making the read-back unnecessary. If that's on the record, no parenthetical is necessary.
Between the time of the request for readback and the next question on the record, somebody spoke, even if just to say "off the record." Just put whatever that is in there and no parenthetical indicating no readback because the absence of a "question read" parenthetical is enough of a clue that nothing got read back.
In this situation, I asked the attorney to restate his question.

RSS

Latest Activity

Vanessa Jerez joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
3 hours ago
APEX COURT REPORTING commented on Mary Abbott Burkes's group Dallas
5 hours ago
APEX COURT REPORTING commented on Cassandra's group Deposition Reporters Association
5 hours ago
Hill and Romero joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
6 hours ago
Hill and Romero joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
6 hours ago
Hill and Romero joined Mary Abbott Burkes's group
6 hours ago
Joan Pitt, RMR, CRR updated their profile
12 hours ago
Joan Pitt, RMR, CRR joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
12 hours ago
Vy Ngo is now a member of CSRNation
yesterday
Valerie Shand posted a status
"I usually feel this way, so I decided to let the sideways pic stand. :)"
Saturday
Valerie Shand posted a status
"I would like to add some proofreading (and scoping) work. If you are looking for a dedicated and on-time workmate, please reach out to me."
Saturday
Intrepid Deposition joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
Saturday

© 2023   Created by Kelli Combs (admin).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service