Is there a certain parenthetical that reporters use when an attorney asks for a question to be read back and then the reporter ends up NOT reading it back??

Views: 94

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Not that I know of -- usually what happens is opposing counsel, or the witness, say something making the read-back unnecessary. If that's on the record, no parenthetical is necessary.
Between the time of the request for readback and the next question on the record, somebody spoke, even if just to say "off the record." Just put whatever that is in there and no parenthetical indicating no readback because the absence of a "question read" parenthetical is enough of a clue that nothing got read back.
In this situation, I asked the attorney to restate his question.

RSS

Latest Activity

Catherine Holland commented on Janet's page Proofreaders
7 minutes ago
Catherine Holland left a comment for Magna Legal
55 minutes ago
Catherine Holland commented on Kelli Combs (admin)'s group Proofreaders
1 hour ago
Catherine Holland posted a status
"Hello! I look forward to getting to know you and working together. I‘m friendly, fast, and fun to work with. Let’s connect!"
1 hour ago
Catherine Holland updated their profile
2 hours ago
Catherine Holland joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
2 hours ago
Magna Legal joined Kelli Combs (admin)'s group
13 hours ago
Kelli Combs (admin) left a comment for Catherine Holland
17 hours ago
Catherine Holland commented on Mary Abbott Burkes's group Dallas
17 hours ago
Catherine Holland joined Mary Abbott Burkes's group
17 hours ago
Catherine Holland is now a member of CSRNation
17 hours ago
Carree Loudermilk posted a blog post
21 hours ago

© 2025   Created by Kelli Combs (admin).   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service