UGH! I hate this!!! Let me tell you. Proofreading tests is one of the top things that I hate doing. Why, you ask? Well, because here's my process:
1. Transcribe test from notes
2. Use spell check
3. Read over computer screen and edit anything I can see there, maybe add in some punctuation, paragraphs, etc.
4. Print draft
5. Check paper draft against notes. I HATE THIS PART. This is the most ANNOYING, yet crucial part! Why does the most crucial part have to be the most annoying?!
6. Read paper draft again. Check for words that should be hyphenated, looked up on
www.m-w.com, add in punctuation and fix paragraphing.
7. Edit transcript on the computer to reflect changes made on paper draft.
8. Look it over on the computer screen YET AGAIN
9. Run spell check AGAIN
10. PRINT FINAL DRAFT AND HOPE FOR A PASS!
Now, you're probably thinking...this girl is nuts. She actually took the time to type all this crap out in here! Psycho!!! Well, what can I say. I just passed my last 160 and attempted a 180, and without doing all of these steps, I probably wouldn't have gotten so close on the 180 (92%) and probably wouldn't have passed the 160.
So I want to find out who else hates the proofreading process. Share your misery with me, please. But let's also talk about the benefits of it. What have you found in your notes that you missed in transcription? How many words? What errors did you miss because you didn't proofread thoroughly?