Welcome to CSR Nation
Given the age difference, Sharon, yes, I was in the sandbox when you started reporting.
Hehe - thought so. That was compliment, LB. Aaah, to be your age again and know what I know now! :):) C/R'g been good to me & used to have a lot of fun with it back when we traveled w/our clients wherever they went, even abroad - but, looking back, wouldn't have dedicated all my working career to this job...been official and freelance and always owned my own firm. I always said, when it quit being fun, I'd do something else & I think I'm about to that point....
I truly feel for your generation of C/R's - the industry has changed drastically and has taken the fun out of most of it.
I rarely feel like a youngin' these days, but thanks for trying:) I've got nearly 18 years under my belt at this point.
I think the profession is still wonderful, lucrative, and challenging. I'm happy to be in a position to share that with the next generation of reporters as well.
Oh, crap! I'm sitting here trying to count & see if you were even born when I started! :):) Yikes! Well, with the fast pace of technology, I'm afraid there will be no reporters, as we know it. The Judge or a Clerk will have a remote control device to turn on and off a voice recognition device and your transcript will appear immediately on their laptop in real time - no paper copies of anything - everything will be done via computer. Heck, I have clients now who are off paper - want everything electronically. You file anything with the Feds, it's electronic already......
Boy, T.S. have you hit the nail on the head! :) Agree totally!
What is going to happen - and I cannot believe the ins. companies don't see this coming - they're contracting with reporting firms now under the auspices of saving $$ - then they're going after the big firm Plaintiff lawyers one by one & they'll jump all over it! Once these contracting firms have put all the "mom and pop" local reporters out of business (and they will if they don't take their jobs), then contracting firms are going to tell ins. companies & big PLf firms: "This is what our fee is going to be henceforth and you will have to pay it because we're the only game in town now."
Hint to LB: These contracting firms are already establishing their GO-TO reporters regionally. Don't wait too late & continue to turn down these referrals completely. If the DOJ rules anti-contracting Statutes are unconstitutional (like they did in Delaware) and thereby voiding them all, these referral agencies will already have their GO-TO folks in place and you will be out in the cold & lucky to even be a bottom-feeder w/local firms. What gets me is local reporters have absolutely NO CLUE the lucrative business they're losing now, much less in the future. So don't let the likes of NCRA and other Associations put YOU out of business.
Don't be naive - it's all about the $$$ with NCRA, otherwise, they would have folded years ago. But, no, they kept passing this rule and that rule and increasing dues to get MORE money off the backs of slaving reporters just trying to pay their bills & make a good living. And because they're taking your money, they think they can dictate to you how to run your OWN business. This issue is and always has been for 25+ years all about the $$$ - has nothing to do with ethics. (Otherwise, who would want this demanding job - duh!) Some folks just woke up and found a way to harness more business and NCRA, running scared, called it "unethical" because they had no other legal reasoning to stop it...LB, you are smarter than that - don't let them take YOU down with them.
T.S. - 20 years ago we had no vision of the technological wonders and the power of the Internet and just couldn't imagine it. The generation of reporters now are being as naive as we were back then.
Keep posting and updating, please - I'll check back along the way.
Oh, and, yes, this website is great! It takes us a step back to the old ways we did things - asking for help from other colleagues in a respectful manner.
You remind me of GR on CRF, Sharon. :)
You said: “And because they're taking your money, they THINK THEY CAN DICTATE TO YOU how to run your OWN business. This issue is and always has been for 25+ years all about the $$$ - has nothing to do with ethics. (Otherwise, who would want this demanding job - duh!) Some folks just woke up and found a way to harness more business and NCRA, running scared, called it "unethical" because they had no other legal reasoning to stop it...LB, you are smarter than that - don't let them take YOU down with them.”
There might be some confusion. Lisa Migliore is actually one of the main reporters at NCRA trying to do the dictating. I say “at NCRA,” but of course I mean associated with. She’s been on multiple committees, including contributing to the “Model Legislation.” That’s the wording NCRA promotes to the different states to help them, in turn, dictate to their reporters. She’s involved herself as a large part of this issue in other ways as well.
I do think it’s good advice you’ve given her here, though.
Then here's something you might ponder - the Magna lawsuit is inclusive of the Arizona Board and Board members. If DOJ rules these anti-contracting psuedo laws/opinions are unconstitutional and NCRA overstepped their bounds in restraining reporters from taking work from these agencies, reporters may have a monetary cause of action against LB, personally and professionally in her capacity w/NCRA, the NCRA and its board for lost profits in their restraining them from procurement of business unconstitutionally......so if I were involved with NCRA, I would be extremely careful how I worded my anti-contracting opinions and what restraint it puts on reporters from conducting free enterprise since they are a mere organization and claim to be a governing body.....this could get really interesting!
CR - CFR ??
Sharon, you should stick to court reporting because your legal opinions are pretty laughable, but I'm pretty damn fearless and well represented legally.
NCRA hasn't restrained anybody from taking contract work. Complying with STATE LAW restrains people from taking contract work where such law exists, but that doesn't seem to necessarily stop the biggest firms in our country in their tracks, does it?
And you're incorrect. The individual board members in Arizona were dismissed.
"Sharon, you should stick to court reporting"
Maybe LB should follow her own advice.....and surely NCRA has an ethics provision concerning courtesy to others with differing opinions..
Hey, it's your dime, not mine, LB
What is it you don't understand about "dismissal" - they had to sue them FIRST to be "dismissed" - duh! And I'm not sure if they were dismissed "totally" in the Amendment.
I see what you mean, Lisa O. - geez!
© 2024 Created by Kelli Combs (admin). Powered by